Can-Am Defender vs. Kawasaki Mule: Who Wins?

Can-Am Defender vs. Kawasaki Mule: Who Wins?

Diving into the utility terrain vehicle (UTV) market reveals two standout choices for adventurers and professionals alike: the Can-Am Defender and the Kawasaki Mule. Each offers a unique set of features tailored to either the thrill-seeker or the hardworking user. This blog aims to compare these two models, highlighting their strengths and suitability for different types of users, to help you make an informed decision for your next outdoor companion or workhorse.

Specs Comparison

2023 Can-Am DEFENDER DPS HD7-HD9 2023 Kawasaki MULE PRO-FXT™
L x W x H 121 x 62 x 76 in. 133.3 x 64.0 x 77.6 in.
Suspension Travel Front: 10 in.
Rear: 11 in.
Front: 8.7 in.
Rear: 8.5 in.
Ground Clearance 11 in. 10.2 in.
Wheelbase 83 in. 92.3 in.
Fuel Capacity 10.6 gallons 7.9 gallons
Price $13,899  $14,399 

Engine Type

The Can-Am Defender boasts a Rotax® 976 cc V-twin engine, renowned for its high output of 65 horsepower, providing robust performance in various terrains. In contrast, the Kawasaki Mule is powered by a 4-stroke, 3-cylinder, DOHC, liquid-cooled, gas engine with 812cc displacement, delivering an estimated 47 horsepower. The difference in engine configuration and power output highlights the Defender's focus on high-energy adventures, whereas the Mule emphasizes reliable and steady performance for work-oriented tasks.

Overall Ride Experience

Riders of the Can-Am Defender can expect a dynamic and engaging off-road experience, thanks to its responsive handling and powerful engine. The vehicle is designed for thrill-seekers and outdoor enthusiasts who demand agility and speed. On the other hand, the Kawasaki Mule offers a smoother and more controlled ride, prioritizing comfort and stability, making it ideal for extended periods of use in a work setting or leisurely countryside explorations.

Technology and Innovation Features

The Can-Am Defender stands out with its advanced tech features, including an intuitive digital display dashboard, GPS navigation capabilities, and Bluetooth connectivity for a seamless ride experience. Meanwhile, the Kawasaki Mule focuses on practical innovations that enhance utility and ease of use, such as its durable cargo bed and efficient fuel management system, catering to those who value functionality over frills.

Durability and Maintenance

Both the Can-Am Defender and the Kawasaki Mule are built to last, with rugged constructions that can withstand harsh conditions. However, the Defender's high-performance engine and sophisticated tech features may require more specialized maintenance compared to the Mule's straightforward design, which is easier to service and maintain, ensuring long-term reliability and lower ownership costs.

Market Reputation and User Feedback

The Can-Am Defender enjoys a strong reputation for its off-road capabilities and luxurious ride, attracting adventure seekers who are willing to invest in premium features and performance. The Kawasaki Mule, conversely, is praised for its durability, practicality, and value for money, appealing to users who need a dependable vehicle for work or leisure without the high-end price tag.


These aspects underscore the distinct characteristics and intended use cases of the Can-Am Defender and Kawasaki Mule, providing potential buyers with crucial information to guide their decision-making process based on performance needs, technological preferences, and budget considerations.

Relate Articles

Polaris Ranger VS Can Am Defender

RZR XP 1000 VS Maverick X3

Honda Talon VS Can Am X3

Can Am Defender VS Polaris General

Yamaha RMAX 1000 vs Honda Talon